Ability to code in differently constructed programming languages is analogous to speaking in different natural languages with varying grammars. Similar to natural languages, programming languages from different paradigms (styles) vary in their expressiveness and efficiency. One programming language may require many screens-full of complex code to accomplish a task for which another requires but a few expressive lines of code. Therefore, understanding the design principles of programming languages enables computational problems to be implemented in dramatically different and powerful ways; leading, in some cases, to solutions that are more elegant, correct, maintainable, efficient and/or extensible.
This unit examines a selection of programming languages and paradigms and explores the evolution of language design from low-level paradigms that are closer to the execution model of the machine, to more high-level declarative paradigms that allow programmers to model a problem precisely rather than specify its solution. The unit covers paradigms such as functional and declarative programming styles, comparing and contrasting them to programming styles that students are already familiar with, including object-oriented, imperative and procedural programming paradigms. We compare type systems supported by various languages, from scripting languages like JavaScript with weak type systems, to gradual typing as in TypeScript, to advanced compiled languages with strong type correctness, such as Haskell. We see these applied to data-modeling techniques (covering polymorphism, mutability-versus-purity, state management, and side-effects) and different models of execution such as strict-versus-lazy evaluation.
The unit provides practical experience with using modern functional programming techniques, non-procedural, non-object-oriented programming languages and discusses the influence of programming language theory on the design of current main-stream computer languages, and how the theory translates to practice. A focus of the unit is that these techniques are applicable and ubiquitous in a variety of modern languages, for example, we will see how functional programming techniques are used in relatively conventional imperative languages like JavaScript, and compare and contrast this with pure functional languages, such as Haskell.
